cregit-Linux how code gets into the kernel

Release 4.7 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c

/*
 * menu.c - the menu idle governor
 *
 * Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
 * Copyright (C) 2009 Intel Corporation
 * Author:
 *        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
 *
 * This code is licenced under the GPL version 2 as described
 * in the COPYING file that acompanies the Linux Kernel.
 */

#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/module.h>

/*
 * Please note when changing the tuning values:
 * If (MAX_INTERESTING-1) * RESOLUTION > UINT_MAX, the result of
 * a scaling operation multiplication may overflow on 32 bit platforms.
 * In that case, #define RESOLUTION as ULL to get 64 bit result:
 * #define RESOLUTION 1024ULL
 *
 * The default values do not overflow.
 */

#define BUCKETS 12

#define INTERVAL_SHIFT 3

#define INTERVALS (1UL << INTERVAL_SHIFT)

#define RESOLUTION 1024

#define DECAY 8

#define MAX_INTERESTING 50000


/*
 * Concepts and ideas behind the menu governor
 *
 * For the menu governor, there are 3 decision factors for picking a C
 * state:
 * 1) Energy break even point
 * 2) Performance impact
 * 3) Latency tolerance (from pmqos infrastructure)
 * These these three factors are treated independently.
 *
 * Energy break even point
 * -----------------------
 * C state entry and exit have an energy cost, and a certain amount of time in
 * the  C state is required to actually break even on this cost. CPUIDLE
 * provides us this duration in the "target_residency" field. So all that we
 * need is a good prediction of how long we'll be idle. Like the traditional
 * menu governor, we start with the actual known "next timer event" time.
 *
 * Since there are other source of wakeups (interrupts for example) than
 * the next timer event, this estimation is rather optimistic. To get a
 * more realistic estimate, a correction factor is applied to the estimate,
 * that is based on historic behavior. For example, if in the past the actual
 * duration always was 50% of the next timer tick, the correction factor will
 * be 0.5.
 *
 * menu uses a running average for this correction factor, however it uses a
 * set of factors, not just a single factor. This stems from the realization
 * that the ratio is dependent on the order of magnitude of the expected
 * duration; if we expect 500 milliseconds of idle time the likelihood of
 * getting an interrupt very early is much higher than if we expect 50 micro
 * seconds of idle time. A second independent factor that has big impact on
 * the actual factor is if there is (disk) IO outstanding or not.
 * (as a special twist, we consider every sleep longer than 50 milliseconds
 * as perfect; there are no power gains for sleeping longer than this)
 *
 * For these two reasons we keep an array of 12 independent factors, that gets
 * indexed based on the magnitude of the expected duration as well as the
 * "is IO outstanding" property.
 *
 * Repeatable-interval-detector
 * ----------------------------
 * There are some cases where "next timer" is a completely unusable predictor:
 * Those cases where the interval is fixed, for example due to hardware
 * interrupt mitigation, but also due to fixed transfer rate devices such as
 * mice.
 * For this, we use a different predictor: We track the duration of the last 8
 * intervals and if the stand deviation of these 8 intervals is below a
 * threshold value, we use the average of these intervals as prediction.
 *
 * Limiting Performance Impact
 * ---------------------------
 * C states, especially those with large exit latencies, can have a real
 * noticeable impact on workloads, which is not acceptable for most sysadmins,
 * and in addition, less performance has a power price of its own.
 *
 * As a general rule of thumb, menu assumes that the following heuristic
 * holds:
 *     The busier the system, the less impact of C states is acceptable
 *
 * This rule-of-thumb is implemented using a performance-multiplier:
 * If the exit latency times the performance multiplier is longer than
 * the predicted duration, the C state is not considered a candidate
 * for selection due to a too high performance impact. So the higher
 * this multiplier is, the longer we need to be idle to pick a deep C
 * state, and thus the less likely a busy CPU will hit such a deep
 * C state.
 *
 * Two factors are used in determing this multiplier:
 * a value of 10 is added for each point of "per cpu load average" we have.
 * a value of 5 points is added for each process that is waiting for
 * IO on this CPU.
 * (these values are experimentally determined)
 *
 * The load average factor gives a longer term (few seconds) input to the
 * decision, while the iowait value gives a cpu local instantanious input.
 * The iowait factor may look low, but realize that this is also already
 * represented in the system load average.
 *
 */


struct menu_device {
	
int		last_state_idx;
	
int             needs_update;

	
unsigned int	next_timer_us;
	
unsigned int	predicted_us;
	
unsigned int	bucket;
	
unsigned int	correction_factor[BUCKETS];
	
unsigned int	intervals[INTERVALS];
	
int		interval_ptr;
};



#define LOAD_INT(x) ((x) >> FSHIFT)

#define LOAD_FRAC(x) LOAD_INT(((x) & (FIXED_1-1)) * 100)


static inline int get_loadavg(unsigned long load) { return LOAD_INT(load) * 10 + LOAD_FRAC(load) / 10; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
arjan van de venarjan van de ven2076.92%150.00%
mel gormanmel gorman623.08%150.00%
Total26100.00%2100.00%


static inline int which_bucket(unsigned int duration, unsigned long nr_iowaiters) { int bucket = 0; /* * We keep two groups of stats; one with no * IO pending, one without. * This allows us to calculate * E(duration)|iowait */ if (nr_iowaiters) bucket = BUCKETS/2; if (duration < 10) return bucket; if (duration < 100) return bucket + 1; if (duration < 1000) return bucket + 2; if (duration < 10000) return bucket + 3; if (duration < 100000) return bucket + 4; return bucket + 5; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
arjan van de venarjan van de ven8494.38%150.00%
mel gormanmel gorman55.62%150.00%
Total89100.00%2100.00%

/* * Return a multiplier for the exit latency that is intended * to take performance requirements into account. * The more performance critical we estimate the system * to be, the higher this multiplier, and thus the higher * the barrier to go to an expensive C state. */
static inline int performance_multiplier(unsigned long nr_iowaiters, unsigned long load) { int mult = 1; /* for higher loadavg, we are more reluctant */ mult += 2 * get_loadavg(load); /* for IO wait tasks (per cpu!) we add 5x each */ mult += 10 * nr_iowaiters; return mult; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
arjan van de venarjan van de ven2972.50%133.33%
mel gormanmel gorman1127.50%266.67%
Total40100.00%3100.00%

static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices); static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev); /* * Try detecting repeating patterns by keeping track of the last 8 * intervals, and checking if the standard deviation of that set * of points is below a threshold. If it is... then use the * average of these 8 points as the estimated value. */
static unsigned int get_typical_interval(struct menu_device *data) { int i, divisor; unsigned int max, thresh, avg; uint64_t sum, variance; thresh = UINT_MAX; /* Discard outliers above this value */ again: /* First calculate the average of past intervals */ max = 0; sum = 0; divisor = 0; for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++) { unsigned int value = data->intervals[i]; if (value <= thresh) { sum += value; divisor++; if (value > max) max = value; } } if (divisor == INTERVALS) avg = sum >> INTERVAL_SHIFT; else avg = div_u64(sum, divisor); /* Then try to determine variance */ variance = 0; for (i = 0; i < INTERVALS; i++) { unsigned int value = data->intervals[i]; if (value <= thresh) { int64_t diff = (int64_t)value - avg; variance += diff * diff; } } if (divisor == INTERVALS) variance >>= INTERVAL_SHIFT; else do_div(variance, divisor); /* * The typical interval is obtained when standard deviation is * small (stddev <= 20 us, variance <= 400 us^2) or standard * deviation is small compared to the average interval (avg > * 6*stddev, avg^2 > 36*variance). The average is smaller than * UINT_MAX aka U32_MAX, so computing its square does not * overflow a u64. We simply reject this candidate average if * the standard deviation is greater than 715 s (which is * rather unlikely). * * Use this result only if there is no timer to wake us up sooner. */ if (likely(variance <= U64_MAX/36)) { if ((((u64)avg*avg > variance*36) && (divisor * 4 >= INTERVALS * 3)) || variance <= 400) { return avg; } } /* * If we have outliers to the upside in our distribution, discard * those by setting the threshold to exclude these outliers, then * calculate the average and standard deviation again. Once we get * down to the bottom 3/4 of our samples, stop excluding samples. * * This can deal with workloads that have long pauses interspersed * with sporadic activity with a bunch of short pauses. */ if ((divisor * 4) <= INTERVALS * 3) return UINT_MAX; thresh = max - 1; goto again; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
youquan songyouquan song11040.59%218.18%
arjan van de venarjan van de ven6523.99%19.09%
rasmus villemoesrasmus villemoes3512.92%218.18%
tuukka tikkanentuukka tikkanen3412.55%436.36%
mel gormanmel gorman207.38%19.09%
rik van rielrik van riel72.58%19.09%
Total271100.00%11100.00%

/** * menu_select - selects the next idle state to enter * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data * @dev: the CPU */
static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev) { struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices); int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY); int i; unsigned int interactivity_req; unsigned int expected_interval; unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load; if (data->needs_update) { menu_update(drv, dev); data->needs_update = 0; } /* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */ if (unlikely(latency_req == 0)) return 0; /* determine the expected residency time, round up */ data->next_timer_us = ktime_to_us(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()); get_iowait_load(&nr_iowaiters, &cpu_load); data->bucket = which_bucket(data->next_timer_us, nr_iowaiters); /* * Force the result of multiplication to be 64 bits even if both * operands are 32 bits. * Make sure to round up for half microseconds. */ data->predicted_us = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)data->next_timer_us * data->correction_factor[data->bucket], RESOLUTION * DECAY); expected_interval = get_typical_interval(data); expected_interval = min(expected_interval, data->next_timer_us); if (CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START > 0) { struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START]; unsigned int polling_threshold; /* * We want to default to C1 (hlt), not to busy polling * unless the timer is happening really really soon, or * C1's exit latency exceeds the user configured limit. */ polling_threshold = max_t(unsigned int, 20, s->target_residency); if (data->next_timer_us > polling_threshold && latency_req > s->exit_latency && !s->disabled && !dev->states_usage[CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START].disable) data->last_state_idx = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; else data->last_state_idx = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START - 1; } else { data->last_state_idx = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; } /* * Use the lowest expected idle interval to pick the idle state. */ data->predicted_us = min(data->predicted_us, expected_interval); /* * Use the performance multiplier and the user-configurable * latency_req to determine the maximum exit latency. */ interactivity_req = data->predicted_us / performance_multiplier(nr_iowaiters, cpu_load); if (latency_req > interactivity_req) latency_req = interactivity_req; /* * Find the idle state with the lowest power while satisfying * our constraints. */ for (i = data->last_state_idx + 1; i < drv->state_count; i++) { struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i]; struct cpuidle_state_usage *su = &dev->states_usage[i]; if (s->disabled || su->disable) continue; if (s->target_residency > data->predicted_us) continue; if (s->exit_latency > latency_req) continue; data->last_state_idx = i; } return data->last_state_idx; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
len brownlen brown7720.10%13.85%
rafael j. wysockirafael j. wysocki6918.02%415.38%
rik van rielrik van riel6216.19%13.85%
arjan van de venarjan van de ven4210.97%27.69%
liu shuoxliu shuox307.83%27.69%
venkatesh pallipadivenkatesh pallipadi297.57%27.69%
mel gormanmel gorman225.74%311.54%
corrado zoccolocorrado zoccolo194.96%13.85%
tuukka tikkanentuukka tikkanen123.13%311.54%
deepthi dharwardeepthi dharwar92.35%13.85%
ai liai li51.31%13.85%
tero kristotero kristo20.52%13.85%
christoph lameterchristoph lameter20.52%13.85%
youquan songyouquan song10.26%13.85%
javi merinojavi merino10.26%13.85%
mark grossmark gross10.26%13.85%
Total383100.00%26100.00%

/** * menu_reflect - records that data structures need update * @dev: the CPU * @index: the index of actual entered state * * NOTE: it's important to be fast here because this operation will add to * the overall exit latency. */
static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) { struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices); data->last_state_idx = index; data->needs_update = 1; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
len brownlen brown1951.35%125.00%
deepthi dharwardeepthi dharwar924.32%125.00%
corrado zoccolocorrado zoccolo718.92%125.00%
christoph lameterchristoph lameter25.41%125.00%
Total37100.00%4100.00%

/** * menu_update - attempts to guess what happened after entry * @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data * @dev: the CPU */
static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev) { struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices); int last_idx = data->last_state_idx; struct cpuidle_state *target = &drv->states[last_idx]; unsigned int measured_us; unsigned int new_factor; /* * Try to figure out how much time passed between entry to low * power state and occurrence of the wakeup event. * * If the entered idle state didn't support residency measurements, * we use them anyway if they are short, and if long, * truncate to the whole expected time. * * Any measured amount of time will include the exit latency. * Since we are interested in when the wakeup begun, not when it * was completed, we must subtract the exit latency. However, if * the measured amount of time is less than the exit latency, * assume the state was never reached and the exit latency is 0. */ /* measured value */ measured_us = cpuidle_get_last_residency(dev); /* Deduct exit latency */ if (measured_us > 2 * target->exit_latency) measured_us -= target->exit_latency; else measured_us /= 2; /* Make sure our coefficients do not exceed unity */ if (measured_us > data->next_timer_us) measured_us = data->next_timer_us; /* Update our correction ratio */ new_factor = data->correction_factor[data->bucket]; new_factor -= new_factor / DECAY; if (data->next_timer_us > 0 && measured_us < MAX_INTERESTING) new_factor += RESOLUTION * measured_us / data->next_timer_us; else /* * we were idle so long that we count it as a perfect * prediction */ new_factor += RESOLUTION; /* * We don't want 0 as factor; we always want at least * a tiny bit of estimated time. Fortunately, due to rounding, * new_factor will stay nonzero regardless of measured_us values * and the compiler can eliminate this test as long as DECAY > 1. */ if (DECAY == 1 && unlikely(new_factor == 0)) new_factor = 1; data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = new_factor; /* update the repeating-pattern data */ data->intervals[data->interval_ptr++] = measured_us; if (data->interval_ptr >= INTERVALS) data->interval_ptr = 0; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
arjan van de venarjan van de ven7235.47%214.29%
len brownlen brown4723.15%214.29%
tuukka tikkanentuukka tikkanen4220.69%535.71%
corrado zoccolocorrado zoccolo199.36%17.14%
venkatesh pallipadivenkatesh pallipadi83.94%17.14%
rik van rielrik van riel73.45%17.14%
deepthi dharwardeepthi dharwar62.96%17.14%
christoph lameterchristoph lameter20.99%17.14%
Total203100.00%14100.00%

/** * menu_enable_device - scans a CPU's states and does setup * @drv: cpuidle driver * @dev: the CPU */
static int menu_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev) { struct menu_device *data = &per_cpu(menu_devices, dev->cpu); int i; memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct menu_device)); /* * if the correction factor is 0 (eg first time init or cpu hotplug * etc), we actually want to start out with a unity factor. */ for(i = 0; i < BUCKETS; i++) data->correction_factor[i] = RESOLUTION * DECAY; return 0; }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
len brownlen brown4256.00%133.33%
chander kashyapchander kashyap2837.33%133.33%
deepthi dharwardeepthi dharwar56.67%133.33%
Total75100.00%3100.00%

static struct cpuidle_governor menu_governor = { .name = "menu", .rating = 20, .enable = menu_enable_device, .select = menu_select, .reflect = menu_reflect, .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; /** * init_menu - initializes the governor */
static int __init init_menu(void) { return cpuidle_register_governor(&menu_governor); }

Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
len brownlen brown16100.00%1100.00%
Total16100.00%1100.00%

postcore_initcall(init_menu);

Overall Contributors

PersonTokensPropCommitsCommitProp
arjan van de venarjan van de ven36127.27%24.00%
len brownlen brown28821.75%24.00%
youquan songyouquan song1118.38%24.00%
tuukka tikkanentuukka tikkanen967.25%1224.00%
rik van rielrik van riel765.74%24.00%
rafael j. wysockirafael j. wysocki695.21%48.00%
mel gormanmel gorman695.21%48.00%
corrado zoccolocorrado zoccolo584.38%12.00%
venkatesh pallipadivenkatesh pallipadi392.95%36.00%
deepthi dharwardeepthi dharwar382.87%24.00%
rasmus villemoesrasmus villemoes352.64%24.00%
liu shuoxliu shuox302.27%24.00%
chander kashyapchander kashyap282.11%12.00%
christoph lameterchristoph lameter60.45%12.00%
ai liai li50.38%12.00%
stephen hemmingerstephen hemminger30.23%12.00%
paul gortmakerpaul gortmaker30.23%12.00%
richard kennedyrichard kennedy20.15%12.00%
tero kristotero kristo20.15%12.00%
mark grossmark gross10.08%12.00%
daniel lezcanodaniel lezcano10.08%12.00%
jean pihetjean pihet10.08%12.00%
javi merinojavi merino10.08%12.00%
lucas de marchilucas de marchi10.08%12.00%
Total1324100.00%50100.00%
Information contained on this website is for historical information purposes only and does not indicate or represent copyright ownership.
{% endraw %}